Dell ALIENWARE m15 スタンダード VR Core i7 8750H・256GB SSD・GTX 1660Ti搭載モデルの詳細スペック・仕様・特長情報を一覧表示。性能や機能をしっかり比較できるから、こだわり派の方も納得の製品選びができます。 LAPTOP DELL ALIENWARE M15 INTEL CORE i7-8750H 16GB SSD 256GB RTX2080 W - i7 Generasi 8, RAM 16G SSD256 di Tokopedia ∙ Promo Pengguna Baru ∙ Cicilan 0% ∙ Kurir Instan. NEW Alienware 15 R4 2018 Gaming Laptop i7 w/ 8 Core 8th Generation. Rp 16.999.000. Cashback. Kota Bandung GanDante's Store (18) LAPTOP DELL ALIENWARE M15 R6 RTX3070 8GB Laptop Dell AlienWare 15R4 - Intel Core i7-8750H, 16GB RAM, SSD 128GB + HDD 1TB, Nvidia Geforce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5, 15.6 inch Giá từ 27.500.000 đ Có tất cả 3 nơi bán GPU RAM P2P ASUS TUF A15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8-Core 2.9GHz Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB Mobile 16GB 99 74 99 100 $999.00 TUF A15 Variants Check Prices MSI Bravo 15 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8-Core 2.9GHz CPU: 8th-gen Intel Core i7-8750H CPU GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q RAM: 16GB DDR4/2,666MHz Display: 15.6-inch 1920×1080 IPS non-touch screen with anti-reflective coating Storage: Entdecken Sie Dell Alienware M15 15.6" Notebook 144Hz i7-8750H 16GB RAM 256GB SSD RTX 2080 in der großen Auswahl bei eBay. Kostenlose Lieferung für viele Artikel! Z9Ybd. Hello,Processor IntelR CoreTM i7-8750H CPU GHzInstalled RAM GB GB usableSystem type 64-bit operating system, x64-based processorI have a Samsung Evo Plus 970 500GB SSD Drive installed as a Primary. On basic operations as opening Chrome with multiple tabs or running an Antivirus the CPU overheats a this is now becoming concerning for me. In games, again the CPU is overheating a lot but does not crash or give me the blue screen of this normal for other Alienware m15 R1 users. Can someone please assist in resolving my overheating issues?I get pop notifications, that the certain cores of the processors exceed 100 degrees Centigrade for a quick few Symptoms Downloading Software for your Alienware System Table of Contents Where to download? How to download? This article explains how to download software purchased or preinstalled with your Alienware system using Dell Download Center and Alienware Digital Delivery Supported Systems Where to download? There are 2 options to download software that vary depending on your system model and software type Alienware Digital Delivery Alienware Digital Delivery is a preinstalled application that will automatically download and install all the software that you purchased with your system. This process will be part of the initial setup of your system when you turn it on for the first time Important Alienware Digital Delivery is only available on systems shipped after June 1st, 2011 Dell Download Center Dell Download Center contains options for all the software purchased for your Dell system. This is for software you purchase once you have received your system and also promotional software like free game bundles will be distributed through Dell Digital Locker Back to Top How to download? Downloading through Alienware Digital Delivery Alienware Digital Delivery will only install software that was added to your order when you were configuring your Alienware system. When you start your systenm for the first time just do the following Accept the license agreement and make sure to allow Dell to collect service tag data, this vital to receive updates and important messages A list of you available software will be displayed, just click Download Now The download will begin and once done you can click on the Install button next to each software Important If you just reinstalled Windows from scratch and you don't have the Alienware Digital Delivery Software you can download it from our Drivers and Downloads page. Alienware Digital Delivery is only available on systems shipped after June 1st, 2011 Downloading through My Digital Locker My Digital Locker can only be accessed once you have purchased software from the Dell Software Download Store. Browse the catalog of software for titles that interest you, then click Add to Cart and go through the check out process. You will soon receive a confirmation email with complete instructions for downloading your software. A message box appears asking if you want to run the application. Click Run. After a successful download, the screen displays a link to install the software. To install the software, click Install Software downloads are stored in the folder named My Dell Downloads located in the My Documents folder If you need to reinstall software that you already purchased just go to My Digital Locker page and download the software. Free game promotions If your system had a promotion for a free game you will receive an e-mail with instructions on how to get your free game through My Digital Locker Important E-mail may take up to two weeks to get to you, please check your spam folder for this e-mail Some games are offered before its release date inwhich case the e-mail will be sent up to two weeks after the release date of the game If the above time has passed and you did not get your email send an e-mail to download_software Can't find what you are looking for? Reach out to our experts on 21 февр. 2021 Date Published 25 Aug 2021 Intel Core i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5 Full HD 1920 x 1080, IPS 2000GB SSD + 1000GB HDD 16GB DDR4 kg lbs Specs HDD/SSD 2TB SSD + 1TB HDD Slot 2x 2280 PCIe x4 + 1x 2242 PCIe x2 NVMe RAM 16GB DDR4 OS Windows 10 Pro Body Material Aluminum, Magnesium alloy Dimensions 389 x 305 x mm x x Weight kg lbs Ports and connectivity 1x USB Type-C Gen 2 10 Gbps, Thunderbolt 3, DisplayPort, HDMI 1x USB Type-C Gen 2 10 Gbps 1x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps, Sleep and Charge 1x USB Type-A Gen 1 5 Gbps HDMI Mini DisplayPort Card Reader Ethernet LAN 10/100/1000 Mbps Wi-Fi Bluetooth Audio jack 2x mm jacks for headset and external microphone External graphics port for Alienware Graphics Amplifier Features Fingerprint reader Web camera 1080p Full HD Backlit keyboard Microphone Dual-Array Microphone Speakers 2x 4W Optical drive Security Lock slot Noble lock Alienware Cryo-Tech cooling 2x RAM slots There are 7 laptops with the same specs, All brands sorted by price CommissionsEarned More Alienware 15 R4 configurations - 154 laptops CommissionsEarned CPU Performance Intel Core i7-8750H 3D Rendering Results are from the Cinebench 20 CPU test the higher the score, the better GPU Performance NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GDDR5 3DMark Fire Strike G Results are for the 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics benchmark the higher the score, the better LaptopMedia is a fully independent company. Almost all of the reviewed products come from online stores, instead of using review samples provided by the manufacturers. Our opinions are based on tests from our laboratory. Contact Us © LaptopMedia Ltd. - Some Rights Reserved. OLED comeback. OLED is amazing, but it's not the holy grail of display technologies. A few key disadvantages outside of the pricier MSRP mean there are still good reasons to choose IPS depending on your usage because a second generation Alienware m15 is inbound doesn't mean that the first generation Alienware m15 won't be getting anymore love. Dell has updated the original Alienware m15 with 9th gen Intel, GeForce RTX graphics, and additional display options to replace last year's 8th gen Intel and GeForce GTX graphics. Perhaps the most notable upgrade, however, is the new 4K UHD OLED option. Unveiled at CES 2019, more and more gaming laptops are beginning to ship with 4K UHD OLED panels to complement the usual IPS options that we've all become familiar with. The older Alienware 13 shipped with a similar OLED option that has since been discontinued. Our test unit today is equipped with the fancy 4K UHD OLED panel available only on select SKUs of the Alienware m15. Such a panel will add an additional $350 over the base 1080p IPS panel to make it more of an enthusiast offering for the time being. For this review, we'll be focusing on the performance and display. See our existing review on the 2018 Alienware m15 for more information about the chassis, keyboard, serviceability, speakers, and more as all our previous comments still apply here. More Dell Alienware reviewsAlienware m17 i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-QAlienware Area-51m i9-9900K, RTX 2080Alienware m15 i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-QAlienware 17 R5Alienware 15 R4Memory16 GB , DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, inch 169, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Samsung SDCA029, 156WR04, OLED, Dell P/N 0HHFM, glossy yes, HDRStorageToshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 512 GB SoundcardNvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio ControllerConnections4 USB / Gen1, 1 USB Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections mm comboNetworkingKiller E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller 10/100/1000MBit/s, Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth 5Sizeheight x width x depth in mm 21 x 363 x 275 = x x inBattery90 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitAdditional featuresSpeakers Stereo, Keyboard Chiclet, AlienFX, Keyboard Light yes, AlienwareFX, Mobile Connect, Command Center, OnScreen Display, 12 Months kg = oz / pounds, Power Supply 970 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Aorus 15 W9 Alienware m15 P79F Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q DIN A4 ❌362 mm / inch 265 mm / inch 25 mm / inch lbs361 mm / inch 246 mm / inch mm / inch lbs363 mm / inch 275 mm / inch 21 mm / inch lbs360 mm / inch 252 mm / inch 19 mm / inch lbs357 mm / inch 235 mm / inch 17 mm / inch 2 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / inch mm / inch lbs297 mm / inch 210 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbsThe glossy 4K UHD OLED display is the highlight of the system. Its Samsung SDCA029 panel ID appears to be a generic name for many other Samsung OLED panels as this same ID can also be found on both the Samsung Galaxy Book 12 and Alienware 13 R3. Its 156WR04 identifier, however, is unique. The OLED panel benefits from no screen bleeding and pitch dark black levels for extremely high contrast ratios that are at least an order of magnitude greater than any IPS panel. Response times are significantly faster as well for less ghosting and color coverage is far superior than your typical IPS option. The display even manages to be 28 percent brighter than our IPS counterpart. These advantages all contribute to a visual experience that an IPS panel has no hopes of matching. There are two key disadvantages of the OLED panel to keep in mind. Firstly, it suffers from pulse-width modulation PWM on all brightness levels on the Alienware m15. Users sensitive to onscreen flickering may want to avoid the OLED option as we're able to record a worryingly low flickering frequency of 60 Hz. Secondly, the panel is limited to a native refresh rate of only 60 Hz compared to 144 Hz or 240 Hz for the IPS SKUs. The OLED display may look amazing for still pictures or slow-moving videos, but it cannot yet match the smoothness of IPS especially during fast-paced games. Distribution of brightnessSamsung SDCA029, 156WR04X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum cd/m² Nits Average cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 90 %Center on Battery cd/m²Contrast ∞1 Black 0 cd/m²ΔE Color Greyscale sRGB Argyll 3D91% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D100% AdobeRGB 1998 Argyll 3D100% sRGB Argyll 3D Display P3 Argyll 3DGamma m15 P79FSamsung SDCA029, 156WR04, OLED, 3840x2160Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QAU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080Asus Zephyrus S GX502GWAU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080Aorus 15 W9LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 LGD05E8, IPS, 1920x1080Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDLQ156D1, IPS, 3840x2160Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHgLP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080Display-27%-26%-25%-14%-26% Display P3 -36% -35% -36% -20% -36% sRGB -11%91 -9% -6% -2% -8% AdobeRGB 1998 -35% -34% -34% -20% -35%Response Times-507%-230%-502%-543%-549% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * ? ? ? ? ? ? Response Time Black / White * ?1, ? ? ? ?18, ?8, PWM ?1001000 ?251561%Screen-9%4%-15%-28%-4%Brightness -22%286 -37%295 -35% 0% -29%Brightness452346 -23%275 -39%292 -35%414 -8%298 -34%Brightness Distribution9086 -4%90 0%80 -11%81 -10%85 -6%Black Level * dE 2000 * 28% 65% 39% 11% 49%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 39% 66% 44% -47% 57%Greyscale dE 2000 * -46% 21% -78% -146% -29% 100% 97% 91% 90% 100% 97%CCT6114 106%7434 87%6405 101%6407 101%6254 104%6503 100%Color Space Percent of AdobeRGB 1998 -36%59 -35%60 -34% -21%59 -35%Color Space Percent of sRGB -11%91 -9%93 -7% -1%92 -8%Contrast11797738681255763Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * Average Program / Settings-181% / -90%-84% / -39%-181% / -92%-195% / -135%-193% / -93%* ... smaller is betterColor space encompasses DCI-P3 and, by extension, sRGB as its gamut is 25 percent larger. The Alienware m15 is therefore one of the few laptops to support DCI-P3 alongside the MacBook Pro. This particular color standard is useful for film editors while gamers can still enable HDR if desired. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 4 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 5 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices ms. Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM detected Hz ≤ 100 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at Hz Likely utilizing PWM Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness frequency of Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19210 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. Outdoor visibility is better than what the IPS panel can offer as the backlight is brighter. We find the display to be comfortable if working under shade with the appropriate text scaling to account for the dense PPI. Glare will become an issue if ambient conditions become any brighter. Viewing angles are wide with almost no shift in contrast. Unlike IPS, however, there is a slight "rainbow effect" if viewing from extreme angles that becomes more noticeable if viewing bright white content or web pages. It's thankfully not bothersome or impactful to the overall usually offers a wider range of configurable options for its laptops when compared to competitors and the Alienware m15 is no different. Users can choose between a Core i5-8300H or unlocked Core i9-8950HK with 8 GB to 32 GB of RAM and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or RTX 2080 Max-Q graphics. Nvidia Optimus comes standard which means no G-Sync options regardless of R15CPU performance is excellent and one the highest we've seen from the 8th gen Core i7-8750H. In fact, performance is even better than most laptops with the 9th gen Core i7-9750H due to better Turbo Boost sustainability on the Alienware as shown by our comparison graph below. The Razer Blade 15, for example, throttles CPU performance slightly more heavily over time to be about 5 to 6 percent slower after accounting for throttling. The impressive numbers the Alienware, however, come at the cost of temperatures as our Stress Test section will show. Users upgrading from the less expensive quad-core Core i5-8300H SKU will see a near 50 percent gain in multi-thread performance. See our dedicated page on the Core i7-8750H for more technical information and benchmarks. 060120180240300360420480540600660720780840900960102010801140TooltipAlienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit Ø1123 Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit Ø1056 Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 RAID 0; CPU Multi 64Bit Ø1040 Aorus 15 W9 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit Ø1017 Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit168 Points Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1192 Points Cinebench R15 OpenGL fps Cinebench R15 Ref. Match % HelpPCMark benchmarks rank our Alienware within single-digit percentages of last year's model. The only exception is the GPU-focused Digital Content Creation benchmark where the RTX 2070 Max-Q can flex its muscles over the slower GTX 1070 10 ScoreAorus 15 W9GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 5839 Points ∼58% +6%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 5839 Points ∼58% +6%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 5279 - 5941, n=7 5533 Points ∼54% +1%Alienware m15 P79FGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 5485 Points ∼54% Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 5426 Points ∼53% -1%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR 5059 Points ∼50% -8% EssentialsAorus 15 W9GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 9327 Points ∼72% +8%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 9109 Points ∼70% +6%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 8517 - 9859, n=7 9041 Points ∼70% +5%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR 8951 Points ∼69% +4%Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 8875 Points ∼68% +3%Alienware m15 P79FGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 8599 Points ∼66% ProductivityRazer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 8200 Points ∼65% +10%Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 7793 Points ∼62% +5%Alienware m15 P79FGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 7445 Points ∼59% Aorus 15 W9GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 7415 Points ∼59% 0%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 6783 - 7678, n=7 7350 Points ∼58% -1%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR 7212 Points ∼57% -3% Digital Content CreationAorus 15 W9GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 7814 Points ∼39% +12%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 7236 Points ∼36% +3%Alienware m15 P79FGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 6998 Points ∼35% Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 6565 - 8163, n=7 6939 Points ∼35% -1%Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 6272 Points ∼31% -10%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR 5444 Points ∼27% -22%PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2Aorus 15 W9GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 5077 Points ∼76% +42%Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 4418 Points ∼66% +24%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 3570 - 5115, n=7 4406 Points ∼66% +23%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 4380 Points ∼66% +23%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR 3840 Points ∼58% +8%Alienware m15 P79FGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 3570 Points ∼54% Work Score Accelerated v2Aorus 15 W9GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 5899 Points ∼83% +32%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ 5749 Points ∼81% +29%Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 4465 - 5857, n=7 5489 Points ∼77% +23%Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 5407 Points ∼76% +21%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR 4620 Points ∼65% +3%Alienware m15 P79FGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 4465 Points ∼63% PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 3570 pointsPCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 4465 pointsPCMark 10 Score 5485 pointsHelp Available storage bays differ depending on the SKU. In this particular case, our test unit is equipped with the same 512 GB Toshiba XG5 NVMe SSD as on our last Alienware m15 test SSD benchmark results are consequently almost the same between them. It's unfortunate that you can't specifically request Samsung drives instead as the Toshiba offers comparatively slower sequential write rates. See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark m15 P79FToshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512GAlienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QToshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512GRazer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QSamsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQAsus Zephyrus S GX502GW2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 RAID 0Aorus 15 W9Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDSamsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALRAS SSD-24%36%8%21%31% Seq Read19371967 2%1832 -5%2506 29%2611 35%1320 -32% Seq Write10661135 6%1864 75%1712 61%1545 45%1500 41% 4K -8% 64% 52% 74% -3% 4K -9% 6% 1% 9% -8% 4K-64 Read1140995 -13%1159 2%624 -45%884 -22%1453 27% 4K-64 Write938656 -30%1807 93%1253 34%941 0%1815 93% Access Time Read * -100% 14% -38% 22% -5% Access Time Write * -58% 15% -0% 17% -10% Score Read13661221 -11%1394 2%923 -32%1200 -12%1616 18% Score Write1147862 -25%2102 83%1528 33%1207 5%2059 80% Score Total31682667 -16%4221 33%2896 -9%2982 -6%4507 42% Copy ISO MB/s946642 -32%2083 120%2131 125%2577 172% Copy Program MB/ -5% 10% -10%515 14% Copy Game MB/s1013706 -30%977 -4%1094 8%1120 11%* ... smaller is betterCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1 3108 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1 1139 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1 542 MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1 MB/s CDM 5 Read Seq 2353 MB/s CDM 5 Write Seq 1139 MB/s CDM 5/6 Read 4K MB/s CDM 5/6 Write 4K MB/s Graphics performance is about 15 percent faster than the GTX 1070 Max-Q in 3DMark Fire Strike and 56 percent faster than the same GPU in 3DMark Time Spy. In other words, games running on DX12 will benefit the most from the RTX 2070 Max-Q. Raw performance is 9 percent higher than the average RTX 2070 Max-Q in our database to be almost on par with a standard mobile RTX 2070. Gaming at native 4K UHD is possible albeit difficult without tuning down settings to Low or Medium. Enabling DLSS would also be an option if the title supports it. Be sure to enable DX12 to get more performance out of a GeForce RTX card. Running Witcher 3 shows no recurring frame dips to suggest no interrupting background activity when gaming. See our dedicated page on the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q for more technical information and Fire Strike GraphicsMSI GE75 9SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H 24623 Points ∼28% +34%Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OCNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Desktop, R7 2700X 23373 Points ∼26% +27%Eurocom Sky X4CNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K 20909 Points ∼24% +13%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H 20718 Points ∼23% +12%Asus Zephyrus S GX502GWNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H 19123 Points ∼22% +4%Alienware m15 P79FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 18443 Points ∼21% Alienware 15 R4NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK 17675 Points ∼20% -4%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 11563 - 21191, n=31 17489 Points ∼20% -5%Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 16010 Points ∼18% -13%Aorus 15 W9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H 15501 Points ∼18% -16%MSI GS63VR 7RG-005NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ 14394 Points ∼16% -22%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 12038 Points ∼14% -35%Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H 8004 Points ∼9% -57%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK 7374 Points ∼8% -60%Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R5 3550H 6331 Points ∼7% -66%Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565UNVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U 3726 Points ∼4% -80%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsMSI GE75 9SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H 9754 Points ∼26% +37%Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OCNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Desktop, R7 2700X 9364 Points ∼25% +32%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H 7840 Points ∼21% +10%Asus Zephyrus S GX502GWNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H 7277 Points ∼20% +2%Alienware m15 P79FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 7105 Points ∼19% Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 5948 - 8065, n=28 6745 Points ∼18% -5%Aorus 15 W9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H 6007 Points ∼16% -15%MSI GS63VR 7RG-005NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ 4548 Points ∼12% -36%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 3749 Points ∼10% -47%Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R5 3550H 1789 Points ∼5% -75%Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565UNVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U 1147 Points ∼3% -84%2560x1440 Port Royal GraphicsMSI GE75 9SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H 5538 Points ∼21% +42%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H 4032 Points ∼15% +3%Asus Zephyrus S GX502GWNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H 3958 Points ∼15% +2%Alienware m15 P79FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 3896 Points ∼15% Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 3240 - 4742, n=23 3838 Points ∼15% -1%Aorus 15 W9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H 3168 Points ∼12% -19%3DMark 111280x720 Performance GPUMSI GE75 9SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H 34050 Points ∼29% +43%Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OCNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Desktop, R7 2700X 31595 Points ∼27% +33%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H 27762 Points ∼24% +17%Eurocom Sky X4CNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K 26912 Points ∼23% +13%Asus Zephyrus S GX502GWNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H 24267 Points ∼21% +2%Alienware m15 P79FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 23819 Points ∼20% Alienware 15 R4NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK 23308 Points ∼20% -2%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 14723 - 27694, n=31 22548 Points ∼19% -5%Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 20573 Points ∼18% -14%Aorus 15 W9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H 20464 Points ∼18% -14%MSI GS63VR 7RG-005NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ 18205 Points ∼16% -24%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 15145 Points ∼13% -36%Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H 9805 Points ∼8% -59%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK 9032 Points ∼8% -62%Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R5 3550H 8220 Points ∼7% -65%Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565UNVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U 4905 Points ∼4% -79%1280x720 Performance CombinedMSI GE75 9SGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H 16523 Points ∼54% +43%Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OCNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Desktop, R7 2700X 13950 Points ∼45% +21%Eurocom Sky X4CNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K 13928 Points ∼45% +20%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 9107 - 17603, n=30 12665 Points ∼41% +9%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H 12460 Points ∼41% +8%Alienware m15 P79FNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 11573 Points ∼38% Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H 11407 Points ∼37% -1%Asus Zephyrus S GX502GWNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H 10866 Points ∼35% -6%Alienware 15 R4NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK 10700 Points ∼35% -8%Aorus 15 W9NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H 9981 Points ∼33% -14%Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK 8450 Points ∼28% -27%Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300HNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H 7932 Points ∼26% -31%MSI GS63VR 7RG-005NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ 7573 Points ∼25% -35%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ 7358 Points ∼24% -36%Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop, R5 3550H 6399 Points ∼21% -45%Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565UNVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U 4394 Points ∼14% -62% 3DMark 11 Performance 19009 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 24876 points3DMark Fire Strike Score 16197 points3DMark Time Spy Score 6901 pointsHelp The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing HBAO+MSI GE75 9SGIntel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile fps ∼100% +48%Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QIntel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q fps ∼82% +22%Eurocom Sky X4CIntel Core i7-8700K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile fps ∼79% +17%Asus Zephyrus S GX502GWIntel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 58min fps ∼74% +9%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 56 - n=31 fps ∼70% +3%Alienware m15 P79FIntel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q fps ∼68% Alienware 15 R4Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile fps ∼62% -8%Aorus 15 W9Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile 58 fps ∼61% -10%Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QIntel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q fps ∼57% -16%Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 39 fps ∼41% -39%Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHDIntel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 26 fps ∼27% -60%Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X Laptop fps ∼23% -66%Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565UIntel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 fps ∼13% -80% 05101520253035404550556065TooltipAlienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G 59-69 Fan noise is essentially identical to last year's Alienware m15 despite the huge gains in graphics performance. What users should keep in mind, however, is that fan noise is tied more closely to the Alienware Command Center power settings rather than the Windows power settings when compared to most other laptops. When setting the system profile to "High Performance" or "Turbo" on the Alienware Command Center app, for example, fan noise immediately jumps to its maximum of 50 dBA no matter the onscreen load. It's important to set the system to "Quiet" mode when the extra horsepower is not needed. Since we always want to benchmark gaming laptops at their best, we elected to run games and synthetic loads at the "High Performance" setting. The constant 50 dBA fan noise is very loud and almost as loud as the Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW, CUK Model Z, or Aorus 15 W9 when under similar gaming loads. Interestingly, running the system on "Balanced" mode will not reduce fan noise when gaming. It will, however, cause the fans to pulse more frequently between 40 dBA and 50 dBA depending on the load. Users who want quieter fans can consider the Razer Blade 15 or MSI GS65. We can notice no coil whine on our test m15 P79FGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512GAlienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-QGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512GRazer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-QGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQAsus Zephyrus S GX502GWGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 RAID 0Aorus 15 W9GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALRNoise13%17%1%-1%15%off / environment * -1% -0%30 -6%29 -3% -0%Idle Minimum * 6% 5%31 -2%34 -12% 6%Idle Average * 19% 19%33 7%36 -2% 19%Idle Maximum * 43%29 42%38 24%38 24% 43%Load Average * 19% 33%50 1%52 -3% 28%Witcher 3 ultra * 1%45 10%53 -6%52 -4% 5%Load Maximum * 1% 10%56 -12%53 -6% 5%* ... smaller is better Noise Level Idle / / dBALoad / dBA 30 dBsilent40 dBAaudible50 dBAloud min , med , max Audix TM1, Arta 15 cm distance environment noise dBARear and side exhaustSurface temperatures remain largely identical to last year's model with GTX 1070 Max-Q graphics. Hot spots toward the center top row of the keyboard can reach over 50 C when running Witcher 3, but palms and fingers are thankfully unlikely to touch these areas frequently when gaming. Surface temperatures on the competing Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW also approach 50 C when under similar stress the system with synthetic loads to identify for any potential throttling or stability issues. Results are warmer than what we recorded on last year's Alienware m15 with GTX 1070 Max-Q graphics. When running Witcher 3, for example, CPU and GPU temperatures stabilize at 98 C and 80 C, respectively, compared to 81 C and 71 C on the 2018 Alienware m15. Both systems, of course, were running on the High Performance profile. CPU clock rates can reach up to GHz during the start of the test, but this immediately and inevitably falls to around GHz in order to keep temperatures in check. Other gaming laptops have cooler core temperatures when gaming including the MSI GS65. Running on battery power will limit performance. A 3DMark 11 run on batteries returns Physics and Graphics scores of 9467 and 6630 points, respectively, compared to 12022 and 23819 points when on mains. CPU Clock GHz GPU Clock MHz Average CPU Temperature °C Average GPU Temperature °C System Idle - - 44 42 Prime95 Stress - 98 64 Prime95 + FurMark Stress 1110 92 83 Witcher 3 Stress 1410 98 80 51 °C124 °C132 F49 °C120 F °C103 °C128 °C114 F °C89 °C87 °C90 F Maximum °C = 132 FAverage °C = 110 F 54 °C129 °C144 F59 °C138 °C107 F48 °C118 °C108 °C91 F35 °C95 °C92 F Maximum °C = 144 FAverage °C = 114 F Power Supply max. 47 °C = 117 F Room Temperature °C = 71 F Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer- The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 110 F, compared to the average of °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.- The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 132 F, compared to the average of °C / 105 F, ranging from to °C for the class Gaming.- The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 144 F, compared to the average of °C / 110 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.- Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of °C / 93 F.+ The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum °C / F and are therefore not hot. - The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was °C / 84 F °C / F. Pink noise at maximum volume dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseAlienware m15 P79FApple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHzFrequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesAlienware m15 P79F audio analysis± speaker loudness is average but good 75 dBAnalysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too highApple MacBook 12 Early 2016 GHz audio analysis+ speakers can play relatively loud dBBass 100 - 315 Hz± reduced bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only 2% away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz+ overall sound is linear difference to medianCompared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 50%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%When idling, the system demands anywhere between 10 W and 19 W depending on the brightness setting and power profile. When running Witcher 3, consumption becomes stable at 162 W compared to 146 W on last year's Alienware m15. While power consumption is up by 11 percent, GPU performance is up by 15 to 56 percent for better performance-per-Watt overall. We're able to record a maximum draw of 229 W from the relatively large ~20 x 10 x cm AC adapter. Power consumption when running Prime95 or FurMark load remains relatively constantly when compared to other laptops where sharper spikes and deeper drops are more common. Our observations back up the excellent Turbo Boost performance and CineBench R15 loop test results from above. How does the OLED panel impact power consumption? When displaying all white, we're able to record a power consumption difference of 11 W between the minimum and maximum brightness settings. Conversely, the power consumption difference between minimum and maximum brightness when displaying all black is just W. Thus, onscreen content will impact battery life more heavily than your typical TN or IPS m15 P79Fi7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, OLED, 3840x2160, m15 GTX 1070 Max-Qi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Qi7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, Zephyrus S GX502GWi7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 RAID 0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15 W9i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDi9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, Consumption12%-6%-59%-21%20%Idle Minimum * 30% -15%24 -120%18 -65% 35%Idle Average * -12% -24%27 -120%20 -63% -11%Idle Maximum * 23% -9%33 -74%28 -47% 26%Load Average * -2% 6%129 -34%87 9% -8%Witcher 3 ultra * 10%162 -0%176 -9%135 17%103 36%Load Maximum * 25% 9%216 6%175 24% 43%* ... smaller is betterRuntimes are shorter by at least a couple of hours when compared to the standard IPS SKU. We're only able to record a battery life of just over 5 hours during real-world WLAN conditions. Charging time remains the same at to 2 m15 P79Fi7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 WhAlienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Qi7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 WhRazer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Qi7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 WhAsus Zephyrus S GX502GWi7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 WhAorus 15 W9i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 WhDell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHDi9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 WhBattery Runtime50%27%-29%-54%66%WiFi 50%393 27%220 -29%141 -54%514 66%Reader / Idle627953353176899Load103102628162Pros+ extremely high contrast ratio with no backlight bleeding + better-than-average CPU and GPU performance + OLED panel is brighter than IPS SKUs + wide DCI-P3 color coverageCons- higher power consumption when displaying white - high core temperatures when gaming - no 144 Hz or 240 Hz options - PWM on all brightness levels - loud fan noise when gamingIn review Dell Alienware m15 P79F. Test model provided by Dell USThe Alienware m15 is able to squeeze out more performance than another gaming laptop when given the same CPU and GPU. The Core i7-8750H and RTX 2070 Max-Q, for example, are each 8 to 9 percent faster than the average i7-8750H or RTX 2070 Max-Q in our database. If you want the fastest performance possible in a thin chassis design, then the Alienware m15 should fit the bill. The drawbacks are the warmer core temperatures and louder fans associated with trying to squeeze out every last MHz of each processor. Expect CPU temperatures as high as 90 C and fans as loud as 50 dBA if you want the get the most out of the Alienware m15. The wild card, however, is the 4K UHD OLED display. While more than two times the price of the 1080p 144 Hz or 240 Hz IPS panel, we want to stress that it doesn't objectively offer the better gaming experience or automatically invalidate the IPS SKUs. Its higher native resolution, deeper colors, brighter backlight, and faster black-white response times certainly give it an edge, but its native 60 Hz refresh rate is a disadvantage in certain titles where 144 Hz is preferable. Overwatch, Rocket League, CSGO, and Apex Legends, for example, are arguably better at 144 Hz while single-player games like Shadow of the Tomb Raider or Metro Exodus may benefit more from the OLED screen. As impressive as it may be, OLED isn't for everyone at the moment especially since IPS options have been growing more on what games you play most, you may want to choose wisely between 1080p 144/240 Hz IPS or 2160p 60 Hz OLED. It's an excellent start for OLED, but it remains a niche option until more resolutions and refresh rates become available to rival IPS. Alienware m15 P79F - 06/13/2019 v6old Allen Ngo Connectivity64 / 81 → 79% Application Performance91% Gaming - Weighted Average Pricecompare Allen Ngo - Lead Editor - 5077 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011After graduating with a in environmental hydrodynamics from the University of California, I studied reactor physics to become licensed by the NRC to operate nuclear reactors. There's a striking level of appreciation you gain for everyday consumer electronics after working with modern nuclear reactivity systems astonishingly powered by computers from the 80s. When I'm not managing day-to-day activities and US review articles on Notebookcheck, you can catch me following the eSports scene and the latest gaming news. Allen Ngo, 2019-06-14 Update 2019-06-14 Hi, I've bought my Alienware, 4 months ago back in end of January 2020, and it was doing all fine and well until very recently after a "forced" reset, where I've started experimenting some massive and what seems to be an irreversible FPS loss in every single application or game I've launched. I used to have around 100-120 fps on FFXIV while playing on max settings, and now i'm looking at 20-30 fps at best, the same way I was normally having a 200-240 fps on League of Legends when I am now experimenting a 60-80 in game frame rate. This performance drop is not application related in any sort of way. It's been about a week now that I've been trying to tweak around this problem going over every available post out there in the Internet, and when I say that I've went through all of them I really mean it, every single one. I have tried to reinstall Windows multiple times, done a complete factory reset of the machine as well, reinstalled every driver to the most stable one, undervolted my CPU in different ranges and tweaked in many various ways around the turbo feature disabling it, undervolting, undertiming etc.. nothing really worked, obviously the fps was still the same very low, and not even close to what it should be. Now I should point out that the heat dissipation system wasn't really working well before that massive problem appeared and i did notice a clear overheating issue at many points when I was playing before, but i didn't suspect this type of problem to appear this early on. Software wise, I have tried every possible action to try and mitigate the problem, so i suspect that the only way for me to fix my product must lie in the hardware itself. I've bought this product from a well known french online retailer, fnac, and I would like to know how and who I should be contacting to get my device repaired. Best regards ! When you get the error in setup on Windows 11 press the shift F10 key then type Regedit drill down to HKLM\System\Setupcreate key LabConfigReg DWord BypassTPMCheck 1Reg DWord BypassSecureBootCheck 1Then press & reload you should be to go!

dell alienware 15 i7 8750h